In We Have Never Been Modern, Latour makes
the claim that modernism never really occurred. He explains modernism as a
separation of Nature and Society. As a result of modernism, the cultures before
it became known as pre-modern and a recent symptom of modernism is
postmodernism. However, Latour is able to bring to light all of the facets of
modernism and reveal them in their contradictory light. He outlines six
resources of the modern critique during his explanation of other cultures as
pre-modern: “They could have stood up against transcendent Nature, or immanent
Nature, or society made by human hands, or transcendent society, or a remote
God, or an intimate God, but how could they resist the combination of all six?”
(38)
Latour
creates his own Nonmodern constitution in light of his discovery that we have
never been modern. He claims that there is an objectiveness to Nature and an
immanence to Society but that they are not truly separated from each other.
That they are connected to each other. And that all of the objects,
quasi-objects, in between are hybrids and are connected to a number of
different aspects: nature, society, culture, technology, science, discourse,
etc.
While
reading Latour’s book, I couldn’t help but think to myself – “Well, duh.” I don’t
think Latour’s hypothesis is all that groundbreaking but that could be because
we are separated by 20 years. What was considered innovative in 1991, that
modernism never existed, might seem to be more commonplace in 2012. We have
been proliferated by movies, books, scientific articles, newspapers, television,
etc., that show our world is interconnected. That even in the past, things were
interconnected. Whether or not people 300 years ago thought of the idea
nonmodernism, doesn’t mean it wasn’t occurring. Latour uses the example of
Hobbes and Boyle in his book to show the influence politics and science had on
each other even though its creators might not have realized it. I think most of
us realize our world is more of a hodgepodge of concepts rather than a strict
dichotomy of nature and society.
But that doesn’t mean we don’t come
from a world that believed in it. Historically modernism has been a powerful
concept. That idea matches much of the Western society at that time. And now
that we live in a much more globalized world, we realize that the world is much
more interconnected and that Nature and Society influence each other.
After reading Latour and his theory
of nonmodernism, it made me think about a short story I had read from Ray
Bradbury about how everything is connected. The story “A Sound of Thunder”
shows how the death of one butterfly in the time of the dinosaurs, changed the
world in the 21st century. One change to the natural world caused numerous
changes in the current society including language and who won the presidential
election. The short story was written in the 1950s and shows that even then,
people were already thinking about hybrids, quasi-objects, and an
interconnected world (though not with those explicit terms).
Latour’s theory of nonmodernism
helps to verbalize and contextualize what our world is already experiencing – an
intellectual move away from the strict dichotomy of modernism to a world that
doesn’t separate Nature and Society and celebrates the multiplication of
hybrids.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.