In the Cheryl
Geisler article “How Ought We to Understand the Concept of Rhetorical Agency”
it seems as if there is a bit of a rhetorical identity crisis going on in the
world of the rhetorical cocktail party. Agency, says Wells, is a subject pursuing
intention through activity.
However, what
most intrigued me is that Geisler has been doing scholarly rhetorical work on
the subject of the digital assistants that help her with the accomplishment of
everyday tasks. “Here”, she says, “rhetor and audience appear to occupy a
subject position strategically fragmented in order to get work done. This
fragmentation of agency…is made possible by a combination of the culture of
systematic management, the affordances of literate technologies, and the strategic
choice of the rhetor who is conscious of what she is “doing” to herself”.
This
“techno-liberal arts” as she calls it, is like Aristotle’s pen for the
speechmaker or the artist’s painting to
that which is represented in the painting. It is a tool or aid to memory. The film Julie
and Julia is about just such a subject of rhetorical techno-liberal arts
that combines a reminder, or biographical account of Julia Child with the
account of a contemporary blogger of cooking adventures.
In the film an
aspiring New York City author and office worker named Julie Powell starts a
cooking blog with the design of making all the 524 recipes in Julia Child’s Mastering the Art of French Cooking in
365 days. She began the blog project
as a discipline and before the end of the year of cooking and blogging, she had
acquired a literary agent and a book deal.
As rhetor, Powell enlisted the assistance of Julia Child via
her recipes, and her blog and its readers to keep her on schedule and to add
discipline, structure and meaning to her life.
She was conscious of what she was doing to herself with this
techno-liberal arts program of epicurean research. Work got done through this
fragmented agency of combined culture of systematic management. It was a team effort by people who never met.
The rhetorical agency was a resource available for use and application as the
context applied. The rhetor had the capacity to act, and in addition, had an
audience in herself and her blog readers.
“Rhetoric, after all, is concerned with the art of doing in
language.” Cookbooks and cooking are a fascinating form of “the art of doing in
language”. (Geisler 16).
I think you make some interesting points. I don't know if the world of rhetoric is going through an identity crisis. However, I do think that this idea of agency coming from varying sources is interesting because just from what I've read through researching my paper topic, there has been a huge push in the discipline to be inclusive. Including a variety of perspectives I think enriches rhetoric and thus the rhetorical situation isn't exactly about the rhetor influencing a set audience. Maybe the audience is also influencing the rhetor.
ReplyDelete