A common theme that has come up in the postmodern rhetoric
has been the discussion of technology in regards to agency, intentionality,
meaning, and interpretation. Before this point, classic rhetoric was a
human achievement, something that stood
out beyond the animal realm or other realms. “have we also initiated a shift in
our understanding off the relations among human beings, things, and the world
they show up in.” Kennedy’s discussion
of animal rhetoric brings startling realization that beyond our narcissistic view
of ourselves, there are other mediums beyond humanity where rhetoric exists. “I
suppose rhetoric is not a “substance" in the logical sense, though it does
seem to me that there is something found in nature that either resembles
rhetoric or possibly constitutes the starting point from which it is culturally
evolved.” Each of the readings discussed an alternate form of more modern
rhetoric outside the traditional forms of human discourse.
A resonating discussion was the agency of rhetoric beyond
the human and the type of fear that spurns from technology connecting the
world. One discussion highlights how issues become larger than their original
intention through technology. “Runaway object start as small problems or
marginal innovations but balloon into objects that are larger than any of the
activity systems that are orientated toward them. That is, objects are no
longer closely bounded or material, are much bigger than the materials in which
they are instantifocated, are multiperspectical…” The traditional rhetoric does not leave room for an agent beyond the human. “Technology itself is not an
agent.” (Bay and Rickert) Movies such as I, Robot with Will Smith help
highlight the human fear that agency will be taken beyond or control by our
creations. Bay and Rickert discussed how
technology is always within our control, “Technology and its artifacts appear as
our objects, themselves manipulable through technical thinking, and not as
object of concern in and of themselves…” Rhetoric has been viewed as something
that must be manipulated and interpreted by society. The fear of occurrences
like the robotic takeover presented in I
Robot represent a fear that the human element will no longer be necessary
for rhetoric. If the human element were no longer necessary in the discourse of
rhetoric than the thesis’ of rhetoric
would be disproven. “rhetorical invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery
are phenomena of nature and prior to speech.” If technology is able to create intention from
its own creation and memory, than humans are not responsible for rhetoric.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.